<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>e-wot? &#187; Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://e-wot.com/tag/email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://e-wot.com</link>
	<description>e-tools &#38; e-tips for e-working &#38; e-ducation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The dangers of email</title>
		<link>http://e-wot.com/2008/09/the-dangers-of-email/</link>
		<comments>http://e-wot.com/2008/09/the-dangers-of-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-wot.com/2008/09/the-dangers-of-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sydney Morning Herald has a good article on the dangers of email. Click for &#8216;Email becomes a dangerous distraction&#8217;smh.com.au
The article reports:
Dr Thomas Jackson of Loughborough University, England, found that it takes an average of 64 seconds to recover your train of thought after interruption by email
This adds up: we can waste as much as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sydney Morning Herald has a good article on the dangers of email. <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/biztech/youve-got-interruptions/2008/09/08/1220857455459.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2" target="_blank">Click for &#8216;Email becomes a dangerous distraction&#8217;smh.com.au</a></p>
<p>The article reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dr Thomas Jackson of Loughborough University, England, found that it takes an average of 64 seconds to recover your train of thought after interruption by email</p></blockquote>
<p>This adds up: we can waste as much as 8 1/2 hours a week if we answer our email as soon as we get it.</p>
<p>I like the reason they offer for why people might feel compelled to check their email every five minutes: </p>
<blockquote><p>Tom Stafford, a lecturer at the University of Sheffield, England, and co-author of the book Mind Hacks, believes that the same fundamental learning mechanisms that drive gambling addicts are also at work in email users. &#8220;Both slot machines and email follow something called a &#8216;variable interval reinforcement schedule&#8217; which has been established as the way to train in the strongest habits,&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, it made me giggle.</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t get any pleasure from email at all. In fact, I avoid it as much as possible. But then maybe I&#8217;m just a Misanthrope.</p>
<p>This whole &#8216;dangers of email&#8217; thing got me thinking about Merlin Mann&#8217;s Inbox Zero idea: <a href="http://www.43folders.com/izero">43 Folders Series: Inbox Zero</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s his video (hour long Google talk about Inbox Zero)</p>
<p>    <embed style="width: 400px; height: 326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=973149761529535925&amp;hl=en" flashvars=""> </embed> </p>
<p>Via Slashdot <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/09/10/1244215.shtml">Slashdot | Why Email Has Become Dangerous</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://e-wot.com/2008/09/the-dangers-of-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://e-wot.com/2007/06/email-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://e-wot.com/2007/06/email-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zoiks.wordpress.com/2007/06/16/email-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new one for the dictionary, I hope.
Email bankruptcy =   &#8220;when you are so inundated with email (both genuine and spam) that you have to delete everything and start over again&#8221;. from Urban Dictionary
Thanks to Philip Tan who introduced me to this new term. He sent me a copy of the following excellent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new one for the dictionary, I hope.</p>
<p><strong>Email bankruptcy</strong> =  <em> &#8220;when you are so inundated with email (both genuine and spam) that you have to delete everything and start over again&#8221;</em>. from <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=email+bankruptcy&amp;r=f" target="_blank">Urban Dictionary</a></p>
<p>Thanks to Philip Tan who introduced me to this new term. He sent me a copy of the following excellent article, in an envelope:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/24/AR2007052402258.html" target="_blank">Click for Washington Post article on email bankruptcy</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a list of people who&#8217;ve filed for email bankruptcy:</p>
<ul>
<li>Moby (musician) is taking a break from email for a year.</li>
<li>Fred Wilson (venture capitalist) &#8220;I am so far behind on email that I&#8217;m declaring bankruptcy.&#8221;</li>
<li>Prof. Lawrence Lessig (Stanford University professor and internet freedom-fighter) declared bankruptcy a few years ago, saying &#8220;I eventually got so far behind that I was either going to spend all my time answering emails, or I was going to do my job.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>No big surprise. Inevitable, I guess. Commercial spam aside, there are just too many emails where the writer has <em>not thought</em> to make the email relevant to the reader. Then the huge quantity of irrelevant emails reaches to the limit where the signal becomes noise and we cease to pay attention.</p>
<p>Tom Merritt, in a quick aside on a recent edition of <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-11455_7-6457370-1.html" target="_blank">CNet&#8217;s BuzzOutLoud</a> podcast, also revealed that he was getting slower at handling his email replies. Not bankrupt yet though. I&#8217;m about the same. I&#8217;m notorious for not replying promptly: I now write my replies once a week, unless it&#8217;s urgent.</p>
<p>In case you need some advice&#8230; Lawrence Lessig explains how to declare email bankruptcy in <a href="http://wired.com/wired/archive/14.08/howtodesk.html">Wired 14.08: How To: Be More Productive</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://e-wot.com/2007/06/email-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

